aster.cloud aster.cloud
  • /
  • Platforms
    • Public Cloud
    • On-Premise
    • Hybrid Cloud
    • Data
  • Architecture
    • Design
    • Solutions
    • Enterprise
  • Engineering
    • Automation
    • Software Engineering
    • Project Management
    • DevOps
  • Programming
  • Tools
  • About
aster.cloud aster.cloud
  • /
  • Platforms
    • Public Cloud
    • On-Premise
    • Hybrid Cloud
    • Data
  • Architecture
    • Design
    • Solutions
    • Enterprise
  • Engineering
    • Automation
    • Software Engineering
    • Project Management
    • DevOps
  • Programming
  • Tools
  • About
  • Platforms
  • Tech

Do We Need New Laws For The Age Of Cloud Computing?

  • root
  • January 6, 2020
  • 4 minute read

Cloud computing, by its very nature, transcends location, geography and territorial boundaries. Data accessed in one country might be stored half way across the world, or even in servers in multiple countries.

International law, on the other hand, sees the world through the lens of various jurisdictions, which are inherently linked to location, geography and territorial boundaries.

So when cloud computing and international law interact, sometimes the results can be highly problematic.

For example, in December 2013 the US government served a search warrant on Microsoft under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. The warrant authorised the search and seizure of information associated with a specific web-based email account that is stored at Microsoft’s premises in Dublin, Ireland.

Microsoft has opposed the warrant since the relevant emails are located exclusively outside the US in Ireland. Under the US government’s view, international law supports them, since all steps to retrieve the data would be taken on US soil.

In contrast, Europe takes the view that the US would be engaging in law enforcement in Ireland, since that is where the data sits. From this point of view existing international law seems to support the European claim.

This situation is nonsensical and the time has surely come to start over. There are increasing calls for innovative ways to solve the considerable problems caused by overlapping claims of jurisdiction on the Internet.

For example, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff recently said in the Wall Street Journal that:

The current free-for-all of competing nations needs to be replaced with an agreed-upon international system for newly designed choice-of-law rules for data in the Internet Cloud.

Chertoff called for steps to harmonise existing rules in a framework of law for the cyber age. Calls such as this are both reasonable and timely. So what is the problem? What stands in the way of serious reform?

Read More  Ex-Twitter Jack Dorsey Admits He’s to Blame for Centralized Web - Musk Comes to Rescue?

A problematic 80-year-old

The problem is that real progress cannot be made without desecrating some principles taken for granted by most lawyers, policy-makers and politicians and held as holy by the international law community.

The approach international law takes to these matters stems from 1935, when the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime (the so-called ”Harvard Draft”) was published. It articulated a set of grounds for jurisdiction to varying degrees recognised under international law.

Most importantly, it pointed to the so-called territorial principle – which places focus on the geographical location of events, persons, data etc. – as being “everywhere regarded as of primary importance and of fundamental character”.

It might sound pretty straightforward and uncontroversial. But it’s not in a world of cloud computing.

Unfortunately, we have allowed the Harvard Draft principles to galvanise 1930’s thinking of the world. Eighty-year-old principles from a very different world are still governing us, and they are restricting our thinking today.

As an unsurprising consequence, the principles found in the Harvard Draft are no longer part of any solution. They have become a part of the problem. And nowhere is this truth more obvious than in the context of jurisdictional claims in relation to the internet.

A new paradigm

To move forward, we must recognise that the territoriality principle, and the other Harvard Draft principles, are merely proxy principles for underlying core principles. They were, after all, constructed to reflect the legal practise at the time.

Particularly when we are trying to apply the law to novel phenomena that need to become the subject of clear legal rules, we need to cut away the undergrowth of such proxy principles and identify the core principles that are reflected in them. Only then will we be able to focus on the considerations and values that truly are to be balanced.

Read More  Google Cloud Next 2019 | Making Books Accessible to the Visually Impaired

It seems to me that the essence of the jurisdictional principles currently used may be distilled into three core principles.

Jurisdiction may only be exercised where:

  1. there is a substantial connection between the matter and the state seeking to exercise jurisdiction
  2. the state seeking to exercise jurisdiction has a legitimate interest in the matter
  3. the exercise of jurisdiction is reasonable given the proportionality between the state’s legitimate interests and other competing (state) interests.

The proposed paradigm shift from proxy principles to core principles represents an important philosophical and theoretical change. However, it is on the practical level that the main benefits will be seen.

Done carefully and diligently, the shift would see no practical change in non-controversial areas of jurisdiction since territoriality typically will be associated with both a substantial connection and a legitimate interest.

At the same time, the proposed paradigm shift would see us being much better equipped to address what is now controversial areas. It will allow us to think in more creatively rather than just mechanically binary.

It would, for example, free us from the thinking that state A always must have a jurisdictional claim over all aspects of data that happened to be located on a server located in state A – a notion that simply does not fit with the nature of cloud computing.

 

Author: Dan Jerker B. Svantesson is the Co-Director Centre for Commercial Law at Bond University

This article originally appeared in the World Economic Forum.

 

root

You May Also Like
View Post
  • Computing
  • Platforms

Kubernetes K8s.gcr.io Redirect: What You Need To Know As An Anthos Or GKE User

  • March 30, 2023
View Post
  • Data
  • Platforms

Google Data Cloud & AI Summit : In Less Than 12 Hours From Now

  • March 29, 2023
View Post
  • Platforms
  • Technology

Introducing GPT-4 In Azure OpenAI Service

  • March 21, 2023
View Post
  • Platforms
  • Solutions
  • Technology

Cloudflare Takes On Online Fraud Detection Market

  • March 15, 2023
View Post
  • People
  • Platforms
  • Technology

Women’s History Month: Celebrating The Success Of Women Founders: Schoolio

  • March 14, 2023
View Post
  • Platforms
  • Technology

Cloudflare Integrates With Atlassian, Microsoft, And Sumo Logic To Make Zero Trust Security Easy For Businesses

  • March 14, 2023
View Post
  • Platforms

Oxford Quantum Circuits Installing Quantum Computer in Equinix IBX® Data Center With Plans To Open Access to Businesses Globally

  • March 14, 2023
View Post
  • Software
  • Tech
  • Technology

A New Smartphone Operating System That Puts Privacy First

  • March 10, 2023

Stay Connected!
LATEST
  • 1
    Kubernetes K8s.gcr.io Redirect: What You Need To Know As An Anthos Or GKE User
    • March 30, 2023
  • 2
    Oracle Helidon Taps Virtual Threads For ‘Pure Performance’
    • March 29, 2023
  • 3
    2022 State Of DevOps Report Data Deep Dive: Good Team Culture
    • March 29, 2023
  • 4
    Google Data Cloud & AI Summit : In Less Than 12 Hours From Now
    • March 29, 2023
  • 5
    A 5-Minute Tour Of The Fediverse
    • March 28, 2023
  • 6
    Bringing Observability To Cloud Security
    • March 28, 2023
  • 7
    How AI Can Improve Digital Security
    • March 27, 2023
  • 8
    Docker’s Bad Week
    • March 27, 2023
  • 9
    My First Pull Request At Age 14
    • March 24, 2023
  • 10
    AWS Chatbot Now Integrated Into Microsoft Teams
    • March 24, 2023
about
Hello World!

We are aster.cloud. We’re created by programmers for programmers.

Our site aims to provide guides, programming tips, reviews, and interesting materials for tech people and those who want to learn in general.

We would like to hear from you.

If you have any feedback, enquiries, or sponsorship request, kindly reach out to us at:

[email protected]
Most Popular
  • 1
    Introducing GPT-4 In Azure OpenAI Service
    • March 21, 2023
  • 2
    IBM And Fundación Ikerbasque Partner To Launch Groundbreaking Quantum Computational Center
    • March 24, 2023
  • 3
    Cleveland Clinic And IBM Unveil First Quantum Computer Dedicated To Healthcare Research
    • March 20, 2023
  • 4
    Verify POST Endpoint Availability With Uptime Checks
    • March 24, 2023
  • 5
    Oracle Cloud Infrastructure to Increase the Reliability, Efficiency, and Simplicity of Large-Scale Kubernetes Environments at Reduced Costs
    • March 20, 2023
  • /
  • Platforms
  • Architecture
  • Engineering
  • Programming
  • Tools
  • About

Input your search keywords and press Enter.